A jó közigazgatási eljárás alapjogi és alapelvi szintű kihívásai
- mesterséges intelligencia vonatkozásában
LETÖLTÉS |
Jog-Állam-Politika, 2025/1.35 |
PATYI ANDRÁS – VÁCZI PÉTER
„Ne a változástól, az állandóságtól félj!”
(Lao-ce)
ABSTRACT
From the moment Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Automated Decision Making (ADM) systems started to be applied in administrative decision-making, AI entered the field of
administrative law. Due to the strong constitutional determination of administrative law and its determination by the rule of law, this new circumstance justifies the need to examine administrative law from a constitutional perspective. This paper will examine from two perspectives: on the one hand, which existing rules and principles of administrative
law are particularly relevant to the emergence of ADM and AI, and conversely, which new rules and principles of administrative law may justify the development of AI and ADM.
In our study, we will identify some of the questions we consider key to the interaction between AI and ADM and traditional principles of good administrative procedure (fair
administration). The human factor is at the heart of the application of AI and ADM: how far can the human factor be reduced by automated decision-making based on AI? On the
other hand, is the empowerment of individuals in the decision-making process sufficient to address the challenges posed by AI systems?
keywords
good public administration | fair procedure | artificial Intelligence
| automated decision-making
bibliography
A helyes hivatali magatartás európai kódexe (2005), Luxembourg: Az Európai Közösségek Hivatalos Kiadványainak Hivatala.
Bignami, Francesca (2004): Three generations of participation rights before the European Commission. In: Law and Contemporary Problems. 68(1).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/27592077.
Bonomo, di Annamaria (2015), The right to good administration and the administrative inaction: a troubled relationship. In: Diritto Pubblico Europeo Rassegna Online. 2/2015.
Cananea, Giacinto Della (2004): The European Union’s mixed administrative proceedings. In: Law and Contemporary Problems. 68(1).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/27592083.
Council of Europe, Ad Hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence (CAHAI): Feasibility Study, CAHAI (2020) 23, Strasbourg.
De La Serre, Eric Barbier (2006), Procedural justice in the European Community case-law concerning the rights of the defence: essentialist and instrumental trends. In: European Public Law. Vol. 12/2006, Issue 2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/euro2006015.
Fortsakis, Theodore (2005): Principles governing good administration. In: European Public Law. Volume 11/2005, Issue 2. Kluwer Law International.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/euro2005019.
Franchini, Claudio (2004): European principles governing administrative proceedings. In: Public Law. Winter.
- Karácsony Gergely (2020): Inkább bízzunk a robotokban? A mesterséges intelligencia döntéseiért való emberi felelősség kritikája In: Jog–Állam–Politika. Jog- és politikatudományi folyóirat. 2020/különszám.
- Karácsony Gergely (2020): Okos eszközök – okos jog? A mesterséges intelligencia szabályozási kérdései. Dialóg Campus, Budapest.
Hill, Robin K. (2015): What an Algorithm is. In: Philosophy & Technology. 56(6).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13347-014-0184-5.
Hofman, Herwig C. H. (2021): An Introduction to Automated Decision Making (ADM) and Cyber-Delegation in the Scope of EU Public Law. In: Law Working Paper Series. 2021-008.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3876059.
Hofman, Herwig C. H. (2023): Comparative Law of Public Automated Decision-Making. An Outline. In: Fascicolo. 1/2023.
Huggins, Anna (2021): Addressing disconnection: Automated decision-making, administrative law and regulatory reform. In: UNSW Law Journal. Vol. 44 (3).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53637/wcgg2401.
Kanska, Klara (2004): Towards Administrative Human Rights in the EU. Impact of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. European Law Journal, Vol. 10. No. 3. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2004.00218.x.
Lapsánszky András – Patyi András – Varga Zs. András (2024): A Magyar Közigazgatási jog általános tanai. Második, bővített kiadás. Universitas-Győr Nonprofit kft., Győr.
Molnár Miklós (1994): A közigazgatás döntési szabadsága. Közgazdasági és Jogi Könyvkiadó, Budapest.
Patyi András (2009): Az ügyfélre és más eljárási szereplőkre vonatkozó általános szabályok. In: Patyi András (szerk.): Közigazgatási hatósági eljárásjog. Dialóg Campus Kiadó, Budapest–Pécs.
Patyi András (2017): A közigazgatási működés jogi alapjai. Dialóg Campus Kiadó, Budapest.
Principles of Administrative Law Concerning the Relations Between Administrative Au-
thorities and Private Persons. A Handbook. Directorate of Legal Affairs. Strasbourg, 1996.
Puigpelat, Oriol Mir (2023): The impact of the AI Act on public authorities and on administrative procedures. In: Fascicolo. 4/2023.
Sanchez-Graells, Albert (2024): Resh(AI)ping Good Administration: Addressing the Mass Effects of Public Sector Digitalisation. In: Laws. 13(1).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4669589.
Schwarze, Jürgen (2003): The principle of proportionality and the principle of impartiality in European administrative law. In: Rivista trimestrale di diritto pubblico.
Schwarze, Jürgen (2004): Enlargement, the European Constitution and Administrative Law. In: International and Comparative Law Quarterly. Vol. 53/2004. Part 4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/53.4.969.
Schwarze, Jürgen (2004): Judicial review of European administrative procedure. In: Public Law. Winter.
Shapiro, Martin (1996): Codification of administrative law: the US and the Union. In: European Law Journal. Vol. 2/1996. Issue 1, March 1996. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315183770-7.
Solé, Julio Ponce (2002): Good administration and European public law. The fight for quality in the field of administrative decisions. In: European Review of Public Law. Vol. 14/2002, No. 4. Esperia Publications Ltd.
Solé, Julio Ponce (2005): Good administration and administrative procedures. In: Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies-. Vol. 12/2005, Issue 2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/gls.2005.12.2.551.
Váczi Péter (2014): A jó közigazgatási eljárás és alapelvei. In: Kaiser Tamás (szerk.) Hatékony közszolgálat és jó közigazgatás: nemzetközi és európai dimenziók. Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem, Budapest.
Váczi, Péter (2022): Fair and effective public administration. In: Institutiones Administrationis – Journal of Administrative Sciences. 2022:1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4217563.
Vértesy László (2020): Döntés a közigazgatási eljárásban. In: Szalai András (szerk.): A közigazgatás tudománya és gyakorlata. HVG-ORAC, Budapest.
Williams, Rebecca (2022): Rethinking Administrative Law for Algorith-
mic Decision Making. In: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. Vol. 42/2022, Issue 2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab032.
Wolswinkel, Johan (2022): Artificial Intelligence and Administrative Law. In: CDCJ. (2022)31. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg.
Wróbel, Izabela Malgorzata (2022): Artificial intelligence systems and the right to good administration. In: Review of European and Comparative Law. Vol. 49/2022, No. 2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.13616.