ABSTRACT

In the current global context, Environmental, Social és Governance (ESG) could undoubtedly be a revolutionary tool if it is coupled with the constraints that force not only the issuance of audited non-financial reports but also emphasize the significant impact that the indicators contained therein have on the market position of organizations. Although public administration permeates the economy as a whole and should play a crucial role in achieving sustainable development goals in the modern state, it is still the classic “polluting” industries that are at the centre of recent sustainability initiatives. The involvement of public administrations would be vital, given that their economic weight remains significant, even when compared to other actors in terms of carbon emissions. The indirect impact of public administrations and the example they set should not be neglected. It would have been worthwhile to make it compulsory for public companies to issue non-financial statements concurrently with their financial statements. At the same time, a framework could be developed within which each specialized public body could work. Unlike market actors, in the case of public institutions, the decision to introduce ESG reporting could lead to a faster start-up due to centralization. At the same time, it is important to bear in mind that data collection may pose the first major obstacle for many public institutions. However, the integration of operational and management data into an information system could yield benefits beyond ESG considerations, such as identifying cost-saving opportunities.

KEYWORDS

ESG | good governance indicators | sustainability of public administration | sustainable development

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Argento, Daniela – Culasso, Francesca – Truant, Elisa (2019): From sustainability to integrated reporting: The legitimizing role of the CSR manager. In: Organization & Environment. 32(4).

Árva Zsuzsanna – Balázs István – Barta Attila – Veszprémi Bernadett (2014): Magyar Közigazgatási Jog. Általános rész. I. Kötet. Debreceni Egyetemi Kiadó, Debrecen.

Avelino, Flor –  Grin, John – Pel, Bonno – Jhagroe, Shivant (2016): The politics of sustainability transitions. In: Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. 18(5).
DOI:10.1080/1523908X.2016.1216782.

Balázs István. (2018): A közigazgatás. In: Jakab, András – Fekete, Balázs (eds.): Internetes Jogtudományi Enciklopédia. ORAC Kiadó – Társadalomtudományi Kutatóközpont Jogi Intézete, Budapest.

Barua, Akrur. (2021): A spring in consumers’ steps: Americans prepare to get back to their spending ways. In: Economics Spotlight. 28.07.2021. (Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/economy/us-consumer-spending-after-covid.html. Accessed on: 15.08.2023).

Boda Zsolt (2006): A gazdasági globalizáció környezeti hatásai. In: Eszmélet. (Available at: http://www.eszmelet.hu/boda_zsolt-a-gazdasagi-globalizacio-kornyezeti-hatasai. Accessed on: 04.08.2018).

Bouckaert, Geert – Loretan, Rolet – Troupin, Steve (2016): Public Administration and the Sustainable Development Goals. Conference: 15th Session of the United Nations Committee of Experts on Public Administration. International Institute of Administrative Sciences, New York.

CDP Worldwide: Five global ions, whose frameworks, standards and platforms guide the majority of sustainability and integrated reporting, announce a shared vision of what is needed for progress towards comprehensive corporate reporting – and the intent to work,2020. Available at:
https://www.cdp.net/en/articles/media/comprehensive-corporate-reporting. Accessed on: 11.09.2020).

Costanza, Robert Patten, Bernard C. (1995): Defining and predicting sustainability. In: Ecological economics. 15(3). (Available at:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0921800995000488. Accessed on: 15.08.2023).

Courtnell, Jane (2022): ESG Reporting Frameworks, Standards, and Requirements. In: Green Business Bureau. (Available at: https://greenbusinessbureau.com/esg/esg-reporting-esg-frameworks. Accessed on 12.05.2022).

Crabbendam, Noor  – Descio, Carolina (2022): The EU taxonomy explained – Here’s what it means for your company. In: Carbon Trust Insights. (Available at: 
https://www.carbontrust.com/news-and-insights/insights/the-eu-taxonomy-explained-heres-what-it-means-for-your-company. Accessed on: 15.08.2023).

Daly, Herman E. (1997): Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development. In: Beacon Press. Boston, USA.

de Oliveira, Bellini  – Cavalcante, Elyrouse Raimundo –Rodrigues, Nonato – Lagioia, Umbelina Cravo Teixeira (2019): Public Sector (Un) Sustainability: a study of GRI adherence and sustainability reporting disclosure standards in Public Institutions and State-Owned Companies of the Public Agency Sector. In: Cuadernos de Contabilidad. 20(49).

Elkington, John (2013): Enter the triple bottom line. In: Henriques, Adrian –Richardson, Julie (eds.): The triple bottom line: Does it all add up. Routledge, New York.

Elsevier: Science Direct, 2022. (Available at:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/search. Accessed on: 12.05.2022).

ESG Innovation Team: Novisto, List of Key ESG Reporting Frameworks, Standards and Ratings, 2022. (Available at:
https://novisto.com/list-esg-reporting-framework-standard. Accessed on: 15.08.2023).

European Commission, TEG: Taxonomy: Final report of the Technical Expert Group on Sustainable Finance, 2022.

European Commission: EMAS Register, 2023. (Available at: https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/emas2/public/registration/list. Accessed on: 12.06.2022).

European Commission: Sustainable finance. (Available at: https://finance.ec.europa.eu/sustainable-finance_en. Accessed on: 12.05.2022.).

GFN: Global Footprint Network, Country Trends. 2022. (Available at:
https://data.footprintnetwork.org/?_ga=2.140101171.1409923929.1670237930-678205174.1670237930#/countryTrends?cn=5001&type=BCtot,EFCtot. Accessed on: 12.05.2022).

Grossman, Gene M. – Krueger, Alan B. (1995): Economic growth and the environment. In: The quarterly journal of economics. 110(2).

Hertwich, Edgar G. – Wood, Richard (2018): The growing importance of scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions from industry. In: Environmental Research Letters. 13(10).

Holden, Erling – Linnerud, Kristin – Banister, David (2016): The Imperatives of Sustainable Development. In: Welford, Richard (ed.): Sustainable Development. Johny Wiley & Sons – ERP Environment, Hoboken, USA.
DOI:doi.org/10.1002/sd.1647.

Honkasalo, Antero (1998): The EMAS scheme: a management tool and instrument of environmental policy. In: Journal of Cleaner Production. (Available at:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652697000681. Accessed on: 12.10.2023).

HR portal: Bérkalkulátor, 2022. (Available at:
https://www.hrportal.hu/berkalkulator.html. Accessed on: 12.06.2022).

Imre Miklós (2016): A közigazgatás kapcsolata a gazdasággal, az államszocializmus és a rendszerváltoztatás gazdasági- gazdaságirányítási átalakulásai Lőrincz Lajos munkásságának tükrében. In: Pro Publico Bono – Magyar Közigazgatás. 2016/3. sz.

Józsa Zoltán (2019): A közigazgatás funkciói és feladatai. In: Jakab András – Könczöl Miklós – Menyhárd Attila – Sulyok Gábor (szerk.): Internetes Jogtudományi Enciklopédia. ORAC Kiadó – Társadalomtudományi Kutatóközpont Jogi Intézete, Budapest.

Kates, Robert W. Parris – Thomas M. – Leiserowitz, Anthony A. (2005): Editorial-What Is Sustainable Development? Goals, Indicators, Values, and Practice. In: Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 47, no. 3 8-21. (Available at:
http://www.environmentmagazine.org/Editorials/Kates-apr05-full.html. Accessed on: 10.11.2022).

Kerekes Sándor (1998): A környezetgazdaságtan alapjai. (Available at:
http://mek.oszk.hu/01400/01452/html/fenntarthato/index.html. Accessed on: 04.11.2018).

KSH: 20.1.1.9. Number of employed persons by industries, economic branches and sex – NACE, 2022. (Available at:
https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/mun/en/mun0009.html. Accessed on: 12.06.2022).

Kuznets, Simon (1955): International differences in capital formation and financing. In: Capital formation and economic growth.. Princeton University Press, Princeton. (Available at:
https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c1303/c1303.pdf. Accessed on: 02.02.2024).

Leal Filho, Walter – Salvia, Amanda Lange – Paço, Arminda – Dinis, Maria Alzira Pimenta – Guedes Vidal, Diogo - Da Cuncha, Dênis Antônio, de Vasconcelos, Claudio Ruy et al. (2022): The influences of the COVID-19 pandemic on sustainable consumption: an international study. In: Environmental Sciences Europe. 34(1).

Lélé, Sharachchandra M. (1991): Sustainable development: A critical review. In: World Development. 19(6). (Available at:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305750X9190197P. Accessed on: 10.11.2023).

Manes-Rossi, Francesca –  Nicolo, Guiseppe – Argento, Daniela (2020): Non-financial reporting formats Non-financial reporting formats a structured literature review. In: Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management.

Markard, Jochen – Raven, Rob – Truffer, Bernhard (2012): Sustainability Transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. In: Research Policy. 41/2012.
DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013.

Maroto, Andrés – Rubalcaba, Luis (2005): The structure and size of the public sector in an enlarged Europe. (Available at:
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-structure-and-size-of-the-public-sector-in-an-Maroto-Rubalcaba/ab73f8148abb1e67e7f0408794de8fbe3404f924. Accessed on: 05.09.2023).

Morelli, John (2011): Environmental Sustainability: A Definition for Environmental Professionals. In: Journal of Environmental Sustainability. 1(1).
DOI:10.14448/jes.01.0002.

Nagy Katalin (2016): Az oktatás gazdasági értékei. In: Opus et Educatio. 2016/3. sz. (Available at:
http://epa.oszk.hu/02700/02724/00008/pdf/EPA02724_opus_et_educatio_2016_03_312-323.pdf. Accessed on: 05.09.2023).

OECD: The European Union sustainable finance taxonomy. Retrieved 12 05, 2022, from OECD iLibrary, 2020. (Available at:
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/5e092588-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/5e092588-en. Accessed on: 05.09.2023).

OECD: Government at a Glance - 2021 edition, 2023. (Available at:
https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?QueryId=107598. Accessed on: 05.09.2023).

Patyi András (2017): A közigazgatási működés jogi alapjai. Dialóg Campus Kiadó, Budapest. (Available at.
https://tudasportal.uni-nke.hu/xmlui/handle/20.500.12944/6919. Accessed on: 05.09.2023).

Peterdy, Kyle (2022): ESG (Environmental, Social, & Governance) A management and analysis framework to understand and measure how sustainably an organization is operating. In: CFI Education Inc. (Avaiable at:
https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/esg/esg-environmental-social-governance/. Accessed on: 05.09.2023).

Pettingale, Holly – de Maupeou, Stéphane – Reilly, Peter (2022): EU Taxonomy and the Future of Reporting. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance. (Available at:  
https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2022/04/04/eu-taxonomy-and-the-future-of-reporting/. Accessed on: 10.10.2022).

PwC: Environmental, Social & Governance What’s it all about?, 2022.  (Available at:
https://www.pwc.com/mt/en/publications/sustainability/esg-what-is-it-all-about.html. Accessed on: 12.05.2022).

Rest, Alfred (2002): From” Environmental Education” to” Education for Sustainable Development”-The Shift of a Paradigm. In: Envtl. Pol’y & L. Vol. 32/2002.

Rugani, Benedetto – Caro, Dario (2020): Impact of COVID-19 outbreak measures of lockdown on the Italian Carbon Footprint. In: Science of the Total Environment. 737, 139806.

Sætra, Henrik Skaug (2021): A Framework for Evaluating and Disclosing the ESG Related Impacts of AI with the SDGs. In: Sustainability. 13(15).

Schwab, Klaus (2015): The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what it means, how to respond. In: World Economic Forum. (Available at:
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/. Accessed on: 05.09.2023).

Stern, David I. (2004): The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. In: World development. 32(8).

Stern, Nicholas (2006): Stern Review: The economics of climate change.  (Available at: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20100407172811/https:/www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/stern_review_report.htm. Accessed on: 05.09.2023).

STRN: Sustainability Transitions Research Network, 2019. (Available at: 
https://transitionsnetwork.org/. Accessed on : 03.24.2019).

SustainoMetric: ESG to SDGs: Connected Paths to a Sustainable Future, 2022.  (Available at:
https://sustainometric.com/esg-to-sdgs-connected-paths-to-a-sustainable-future/. Accessed on: 12.05.2022).

Takala, Martti (1991): Environmental Awareness and Human Activity. In: International Journal of Psychology. 26(5).
DOI:10.1080/00207599108247146.

UN: Promotion of sustained economic growth and sustainable development, 2019. (Available at: https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/chapter-ii-promotion-sustained-economic-growth-and-sustainable-development. Accessed on: 11.30.2022).

UN: Statistics SDG Indicators Database, 2021. Available at:
https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/dataportal/database. Accessed on 12.05.2022).

UN: Sustainable Development Goal indicators website, 2018. (Available at:
https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/. Accessed on: 04.11.2018).

UN: Sustainable Development Goals, 2015. (Available at: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals. Accessed on: 09.15.2018).

WEF, W. E.: The Fourth Industrial Revolution [Motion Picture], 2016. (Available at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChbjZHW2Wwk. Accessed on: 15.11.2020).

WEF: The Global Risks Report 2018. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2018.
(Available at: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2018. Accessed on: 15.11.2020).

WEF: The Global Risks Report 2019. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2019.
(Available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2019.pdf. Accessed on: 15.11.2020).